Last time I talked about some of the interesting discussions I’ve seen on Japanese TV shows, even about subjects that one might think would be difficult to debate openly. One of the topics on the “If I Were Prime Minister” show recently was whether Japan should try to be more self-sufficient in light of the food poisoning scare involving frozen Chinese gyoza dumplings that had been tainted with fertilizer. Although everyone thinks of Japan as an industrial powerhouse, its economy is quite geared towards agriculture, with fields squeezing out a crop of rice and of wheat per field per year, or growing other things like grapes or sweet potatoes or those delightful apple-pears. However, with a population half the size of the U.S. crammed into 1/25th the area, it’s pretty much impossible for Japan to feed itself. The country is only able to produce 39% of its own food as measured in calories, and thus relies heavily on imports from the U.S., Australia, China and so on. Japan is so dependent on outside countries for its food that trends on the other side of the world can easily affect it, like Canada and Brazil moving away from producing soybeans and towards growing crops for biofuel, which hurts Japan’s traditional foods like tofu, natto and miso soup. And yet, Japan’s agricultural system is still built around small units, “mom and pop” farms in which the husband often works a normal job to make ends meet, or extremely small companies often operating with limited resources — basically, the exact opposite of the mammoth agro-business firms you find in the U.S. It occurred to me that one answer to Japan’s food quandary might be to take steps to allow more land to be managed by larger companies who would bring greater efficiency and increase production. For some cultural reason that is incomprehensible to me, this doesn’t seem like a solution that has occurred to the Japanese, which of course might be for the better, of course, in the end.
